No advertising today please…

penI had not realised until recently how much I dislike advertising. I have always been averse to it, but in my youth took very little notice of it and prided myself in believing that I was completely uninfluenced by it, that I had never bought anything because of an advert; most of it seemed completely idiotic to me; I found it hard to believe that anybody could be taken in by it. But it must work; otherwise we would not be so inundated with it.

Until a few years ago, I suppose I ignored it. I rarely watched commercial TV and somehow managed to avoid noticing the adverts when I did. Six years ago I bought a DVD which could edit recorded programmes, so now I very rarely have to put up with adverts – I simply pre-record, edit out the adverts and watch. On the occasions when there is something too good to miss though, I do sit through them. In 2011 Ofcom announced an increase from 7 minutes to 12 minutes of adverts allowed in an hour. Now, there was certainly more than 7 minutes before the increase and since the increase there is more than 12 minutes. Perhaps the seven minutes was manageable; it was possible to stay with a programme despite it; it was not too intrusive: two short breaks an hour or three very short breaks were just about acceptable.

Now the amount of advertising is definitely intrusive and there is much more than 12 minutes an hour. One example is the US import, Homeland. It is scheduled at one hour and five minutes, but my edited version (adverts removed) comes out at 41 or 42 minutes. Although the second and third series are pretty silly, it’s just about watchable. But it is impossible to watch live; the adverts are just too intrusive. After the lengthy introduction which is shown every week and the lengthy recap of what’s been happening, the first break comes after about 8 minutes, barely longer than the break which follows it. It is impossible to get involved in the storyline, the breaks come too often and are too long – all narrative flow is lost.

The extended breaks were originally proposed for a trial run. I doubt if there was any intention for this to be temporary; the breaks have continued and, without any announcement or permission, extended. It is claimed that broadcasters would invest more money in drama. That may be true, all commercial drama is now sponsored by somebody, but the dramas produced are just vehicles for advertising. I can’t think of one memorable drama that has come from ITV, despite an increase in production. Broadchurch was probably the best, but it was spoiled by being too long with a ridiculous and sentimental ending; it contained the same amount of adverts as the US imports with only 42 or 43 minutes of actual programming.

Broadcasters get around the new laws by starting programmes late and finishing early. They tag on adverts for their own programmes so that each break is 5, 6 or 7 minutes, fifteen to twenty minutes in total. I think the new laws have rendered commercial TV unwatchable. The fact that it is watched by millions says rather a lot about the people who watch it. How they allow themselves to be subjected to the advertising, I don’t know. Presumably a great many are influenced by it.

I remember twenty years ago that programmes had two breaks per hour. I can’t remember how long they were, perhaps three or four minutes. It was bearable. I also remember more adverts containing humour, so that even if you were not interested in the product, you could have a laugh about the ad. Adverts now seem consistently puerile, as if the advertising people are assuming that the audience are idiots. One has to assume by the size of the audiences that most of those watching probably are idiots. I find it amazing that people still complain about the BBC licence fee. Every argument against it has people moaning about having to pay it when they don’t watch it. Firstly, I don’t believe that they never watch it, and secondly, if you object to paying less that £3 a week for an advert free station, including radio, a world service, BBC 1, 2, 3 and 4 and the red button, you are probably mad.

I know it is another era and before the time of most of you, but one thinks back to 1981 when Granada serialised Evelyn Waugh’s Brideshead Revisited, with a magnificent cast. It was interrupted briefly twice. Practically the whole country stayed in to watch it, every week. It is unthinkable now that any commercial station would attempt such a thing. The nearest we have had is the recent run of Shakespeare’s Richard II, Henry IV parts 1 & 2 and Henry V on the BBC. They were appreciated and discussed online, but I suspect it was a very small audience.

Advertising for the new products (phones, laptops, iPads, flat screen TVs) seems to concentrate on their coolness, with dozens of happy but vacant teenagers desperate to replace what they bought six months ago. The ads are beautifully put together but absolutely empty. The same goes for cosmetics and car ads: empty cool; either that or half-wits being persuaded to bet or enjoying their TVs exploding or shooting at them. One after another they are stultifying. I dread to think of the American mind, where they have been subjected to this for much longer with less choice. Last year it was said that the average American was exposed to 3000 adverts per day. I think it is impossible to say; it depends on the individual, but for the incautious viewer or internet user, it is certainly a lot. This country is not far behind.

I would like to think that I have been subjected to no advertising today. Nothing when I get up because I don’t watch anything until I get to work. Since then I have glanced at Facebook but did not look at the ads down the side; I have bought some food but I’m pretty sure that I did not look at any of the many Greggs ads plastered all around the restaurant; I did not register whatever ads my email providers tried to tempt me with; when I get home I may watch some TV but it is very doubtful that it will be a commercial station, if it is I will probably record it and edit the adverts out; I will be subjected to the BBC advertising its own programmes (far too much); their many links are unnecessary and must be exorbitantly expensive. But that’s about it. My dislike of advertising is such that when I do watch something like Homeland, I have to turn the sound down and even turn away or leave the room during the breaks – I can’t even stand to see the images. They are horrible: disgusting, sentimental, unrealistic, very clever garbage. I have become immune and allergic to advertising.

I am off to Cuba this Christmas. Whatever else you might say about Cuba, they do not allow advertising – five channels with no adverts – ever. How long they can hold out I don’t know, but more power to them. And thank God, thank Buddha, thank everyone for DVD players that can edit. I may have to buy a few of them for the future. I’m sure the Americans will ban them some day.

12 thoughts on “No advertising today please…

  1. You said it! The only way I can tolerate TV watching (the limited shows that are even worth watching) is either pre-recorded or with a working mute button. Enjoy your advertisement-free Christmas in Cuba!

  2. We watch everything on DVD or Netflix – I never watch television anymore for these very reasons. Netflix is terrific – all the series you want to see are on there, and even you only have to wait a short while for new ones to be on. That’s me, advertising Netfilx….!

    • I don’t have Netflix but am seriously considering it. I don’t watch much television. I love BBC 4 which keeps me attached and I record rare stuff worth watching from other stations and edit out the ads and superfluous stuff. I then put the best stuff on disc (for ideas), but I’ve got far too much stuff. I’d love to do without a TV. Just can’t do it though (yet).

  3. These days, I prefer to wait until the series has finished and then buy the DVD’s and watch them. The benefits are no commercials and a sense of control. Netflix has made this the norm for many people. Perhaps the future of all network TV is a subscription type service.

    • I think you’re right. I buy some DVD series, but find that not many are worth watching. The problem is I enjoy good TV but just can’t stand the moronic standard of advertising these days. Some adverts used to be full of humour but there’s nothing now – just stupid brainwashing nonsense. Sorry for the late reply. Been out-of-touch.

  4. Not sure about the apparent advertisement free BBC. They advertise their upcoming shows with such annoying frequency that it is as off-putting as commercial TV. The plugging of the 50th anniversary episode of Doctor Who was the advertising equivalent of waterboarding.

    • I agree wholeheartedly. The BBC carries loads of advertising and most of it is moronic. How many links do they have? Must be at least 50 – and they are very expensive looking. Channel 4 have about six and that’s fine. Better too. Advertising a programme that starts in two minutes is just dumb and there’s overkill on just about all that they do, for example, the latest (really silly) Wimbledon ad. Everybody knows the BBC have been showing Wimbledon exclusively forever, but they show it 50 times a day across the networks. They are just appealing to the lowest common denominator – the channel hoppers – I can’t believe that it works.

      The BBC is still precious though. To watch a programme uninterrupted is bliss. And rare. Watched some TV in Florida and Indonesia recently. It is fifty times more moronic than ours. The BBC, for all its faults, needs protecting.

      Sorry for the late reply. Been out-of-touch.

  5. Yeah, the lack of in-programme adverts in BBC shows is one of the reasons why I’m happy to pay a licence fee. I know what you mean about a lot of ‘gadget’ adverts but as each product is pretty much interchangeable, the only way they can appeal to people is to make the advert flashy. When advertising first because a discipline, the point was to highlight the unique selling point of the product. If they all boast the same features, then advertisers need to highlight the emotional proposition, which is why car adverts tend to focus on the ‘adventure’ and phone adverts go for promoting a lifestyle. It’s idiotic but people still fall for it.

  6. Pingback: Equivocation | Chris Hilton ~ Writer

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s